Perbandingan Antara Sistem Computer Based Test dan Paper Based Test pada Hasil Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran PMKR di SMKN 1 Sumatera Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/jtpvi.v1i1.10Keywords:
Evaluasi, Computer Based Test, Paper Based TestAbstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi beberapa masalah diantaranya sistem PBT tidak dapat menampilkan visualisasi berupa audio, video, animasi serta gambar yang tidak jelas dan risiko kecurangan tinggi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan terhadap hasil pembelajaran sistem CBT dan PBT mata pelajaran PMKR di SMKN 1 Sumatera barat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif komparatif dengan metode analisis statistik menggunakan rumus uji beda yaitu t-test, teknik sampel mengunakan teknik simple random sampling, sampel diambil dari populasi kelas XI TKRO 1 dan 2 diambil masing-masing 20 siswa. Hasil Penelitian ini didapatkan Uji-t yaitu p-value = 0,005 < α = 0,05 maka H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima, artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil evaluasi pembelajaran mata pelajaran PMKR antara sistem CBT dan PBT di SMKN 1 Sumatera Barat. Maka disimpulkan evaluasi pembelajaran menggunakan CBT lebih unggul dari PBT serta meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa.
This research is motivated by several problems including the PBT system cannot display visualizations in the form of audio, video, animation and images that are not clear and the risk of fraud is high. The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in the learning outcomes of the CBT and PBT systems for PMKR subjects at SMKN 1 West Sumatra. This research is a comparative quantitative research with statistical analysis methods using a different test formula, namely t-test, the sample technique uses simple random sampling technique, samples are taken from the population of class XI TKRO 1 and 2, 20 students are taken each. The results of this study obtained the t-test, namely p-value = 0.005 <α = 0.05, then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted, meaning that there were differences in the results of the evaluation of PMKR subject learning between the CBT and PBT systems at SMKN 1 West Sumatra. So it was concluded that learning evaluation using CBT is superior to PBT and improves student learning outcomes.
References
R. Lapisa, I. Y. Basri, A. Arif, and H. D. Saputra_Jurnal, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Siswa Melalui Pelatihan Auto Cad,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 2017.
M. A. Zaus and K. Krismadinata_Jurnal, “Suatu Kajian Literatur Masalah-Masalah yang Dihadapi dalam Mata Kuliah Jaringan Komputer,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2018.
S. Sukardi, D. Puyada, R. E. Wulansari, and D. T. P. Yanto_Jurnal “The Validity of Interactive Instructional Media on Electrical Circuits at Vocational High School and Technology,” 2nd INCOTEPD, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 21–22, 2017.
Muslim, Martias, & M. Nasir_Jurnal, “Correlation of activities learning with learning outcomes student in vocational high school,” VANOS Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 45–56, 2019.
R. E. Wulansari, D. Puyada, I. Wijaya, and K. Rukun_Jurnal, “EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA BASED GAME ON MATHEMATICS AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL,” Int. J. Res. Sci. Manag., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 125–128, 2017.
D. Pernanda, M. A. Zaus, R. E. Wulansari, and S. Islami_Jurnal, “Effectiveness of instructional media based on interactive cd learning on basic network at vocational high school : improving student cognitive ability,” Int. Conf. Educ. Soc. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 440–444, 2018.
Muslim, Ambiyar, D. Setiawan, and R. Putra_Jurnal, “PROJECT-BASED LEARNING TOOLS FOR LIGHT VEHICLE ENGINE,” J. P. Vokasi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2020.
Novrianti, “Peningkatan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri,” Pusat Pengembangan Ilmiah dan Penelitian Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, 2014.
E. Ratnawulan dan Rusdiana, Evaluasi Belajar, Bandung : CV Pustaka Setia, 2015.
M. Santi, “Analisis Implementasi Ujian Nasional Berbasis Kertas (Paper Based Test) Dengan Ujian Berbasis Komputer (Computer Based Test) Di Smpn 3 Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar,” Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, 2018.
E. Murniati, “Computer Based Test (CBT) Sebagai Alternatif Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran,” Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 2017.
R. Nafiatin, “Perbedaan Tingkat Kejujuran Siswa Sekolah Dasar Saat Ujian Menggunakan Paper Based Test (PBT) dengan Computer Based Test (CBT),” Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, 2020.
Murtini & D. S. Rakhmanto, “Perbandingan Antara Ujian Online (Computer-Based Testing) Dengan Ujian Manual (Paper-Pencil Test) : Efek Ujian, Skor Ujian, Lama Waktu Pengerjaan Ujian, Dan Motivasi Menyelesaikan Ujian (Studi Kasus Pada Ujian Sertifikasi Ccna Cisco Academy Stmik Widya Pratama),” Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, STMIK Widya Pratama, Pekalongan, 2016.
A. M. Yusuf, Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
Lestari, Dwi_Jurnal “Penggunaan Computer Based Test (CBT) sebagai Sarana Evaluasi dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Efektivitas Penilaian pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah di SMAN 1 Boyolali Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016,” vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 30-40, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Opi Tananda, M Nasir, Milana Milana, Muslim Muslim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
