Peningkatan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Dasar-Dasar Otomotif melalui Case Based Learning di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

Authors

  • Wahyu Yadispama Maiga Departemen Teknik Otomotif, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Wagino Departemen Teknik Otomotif, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Donny Fernandez Departemen Teknik Otomotif, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Iffarial Nanda Departemen Teknik Otomotif, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Tiara Mahardika Teknologi Sipil, Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Polteknik Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/jtpvi.v4i1.394

Keywords:

Case Based Learning, keaktifan belajar, hasil belajar, K3LH, Dasar-Dasar Otomotif, pendidikan vokasi

Abstract

Pembelajaran Dasar-Dasar Otomotif pada elemen K3LH di SMK masih menunjukkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar yang rendah, sehingga diperlukan model pembelajaran yang lebih partisipatif dan kontekstual. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan peningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan model Case Based Learning (CBL). Penelitian menggunakan desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dua siklus dengan tahapan perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, dan refleksi pada 28 siswa kelas X TSM 2 SMKN 1 Koto XI Tarusan. Data keaktifan dikumpulkan melalui lembar observasi, sedangkan hasil belajar diukur dengan tes formatif dan dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil menunjukkan keaktifan klasikal meningkat dari 53,85% pada Siklus I menjadi 66,57% pada Siklus II, sedangkan ketuntasan belajar meningkat dari 25% pra-tindakan menjadi 78,57% pada Siklus II dan melampaui KKM. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa CBL efektif meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dan penguasaan konsep K3LH pada pembelajaran vokasi otomotif.

Student engagement and learning outcomes in the Basic Automotive Engineering subject, particularly the occupational health, safety, and environmental (K3LH) element, were still low at SMKN 1 Koto XI Tarusan. This study investigated whether the Case Based Learning (CBL) model could improve these outcomes. A two-cycle classroom action research design was implemented with 28 Grade X Light Vehicle Engineering students through the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Student engagement was measured using observation sheets, while cognitive achievement was assessed through formative tests and analysed with descriptive statistics. The results show that class-wide engagement increased from 53.85% in Cycle I to 66.57% in Cycle II, whereas mastery learning rose from 25% at pre-test to 78.57% in Cycle II, exceeding the minimum standard. These findings demonstrate that CBL effectively enhances student participation and conceptual understanding of K3LH in vocational automotive education.

References

[1] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2013.

[2] W. Ningsih, M. Rohani, E. Sesilia, and H. P. S. Ariga, “Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia melalui penerapan Case Based Learning (CBL) pada kelas XI SMK Imanuel Medan,” J. Basataka (JBT), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 396–403, 2023.

[3] S. T. Naziah, L. H. Maula, and A. Sutisnawati, “Analisis keaktifan belajar siswa selama pembelajaran daring pada masa Covid-19 di sekolah dasar,” J. JPSD, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–120, 2020. C.

[4] I. Lestari and R. Winarni, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Case Based Learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran IPS,” J. Pendidik., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2019.

[5] I. Nanda, Ambiyar, W. Wakhinuddin, M. Giatman, M. Muskhir, and D. Setiawan, “Motivasi dan kompetensi mengajar dosen terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa,” Edukasi: J. Pendidik., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 2022.

[6] C. A. Dewi and A. Hamid, “Pengaruh model Case Based Learning (CBL) terhadap keterampilan generik sains dan pemahaman konsep siswa kelas X pada materi minyak bumi,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Kim. “Hydrogen,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 294–301, 2015, doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v3i2.687.

[7] K. A. A. K. Putri and N. L. P. E. S. Dewi, “The impact of experiential learning on student engagement and outcomes: A case study in a national school of Bali, Indonesia,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Educ. Social Sci. (ICESS 2024). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2025, pp. 278–291, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-392-4_21.

[8] Julhadi, Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik: Ditinjau dari Media Komputer dan Motivasi. Edu Publisher, 2021.

[9] A. Susanti and A. Trisusana, “Student engagement and motivation in a vocational English project based learning,” in Proc. UAD TEFL Int. Conf., vol. 1, pp. 48–53, 2017, doi: 10.12928/utic.v1.149.2017.

[10] M. Rohman, M. Sudjimat, D. A. Sudjimat, and R. M. Sugandi, “Dukungan keluarga dan kesiapan kerja di kalangan siswa SMK di Indonesia: Efek mediasi dari wawasan dunia kerja,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Mesin Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jptm.v10i1.43409.

[11] I. K. Suartama, I. K. Sudarma, I. G. W. Sudatha, A. I. W. I. Y. Sukmana, and K. Susiani, “Student engagement and academic achievement: The effect of gamification on case and project-based online learning,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 976–990, 2024, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21349.

[12] C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–266, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.

[13] H. D. Saputra, W. Purwanto, D. Setiawan, D. Fernandez, and R. Putra, “Hasil belajar mahasiswa: Analisis butir soal tes,” Edukasi: J. Pendidik., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2022, doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v20i1.3432.

[14] F. Herreid, Start with a Story: The Case Study Method of Teaching College Science. Arlington, VA, USA: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press, 2007.

[15] S. Nurcahya Kasmiryanti Ar, Sindi, Nurazmi, and Y. Ratte Misa, “Case Based Learning pada pembelajaran fisika,” J. Guru Pencerah Semesta, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 232–241, 2024, doi: 10.56983/jgps.v2i2.878.

[16] W. S. Nugroho and A. D. Handayani, “Implementasi Case Based Learning dalam meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa,” J. Inov. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2021, doi: 10.24036/jippsd.v5i1.126.

[17] Y. Shi, P. Lu, Y. Yin, and R. Wang, “Whether case-based teaching combined with the flipped classroom is more valuable than traditional lecture-based teaching methods in clinical medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, Art. no. 906, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07465-4.

[18] N. H. Yanti, D. Nuvitalia, N. Miyono, and N. Rizkiyati, “Analisis keaktifan belajar siswa sekolah dasar menggunakan aplikasi Wordwall,” Ideguru: J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 634–638, 2023, doi: 10.51169/ideguru.v8i3.667.

[19] J. J. Lim and B. Veasuvalingam, “Does online case-based learning foster clinical reasoning skills? A mixed methods study,” Future Healthc. J., vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 100210, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100210.

[20] K. K. Umam, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Case Based Learning (CBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa MA Putra Al-Islahuddiny Kediri pada pembelajaran kimia tahun pelajaran 2023/2024,” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia, 2024.

[21] W. Zhao, L. He, W. Deng, J. Zhu, A. Su, and Y. Zhang, “The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 20, Art. no. 381, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y.

[22] W. Wagino, Ambiyar, W. Wakhinuddin, S. Suhendar, and I. Nanda, “Meta-analysis: The effectiveness of project-based learning model on learning outcomes,” VANOS J. Mech. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2022.

[23] W. Wagino, N. Jalinus, R. Abdullah, R. Ridwan, I. Nanda, and H. Hariyadi, “The effect of problem based learning model in 2013 curriculum on learning outcomes and skills in vocational education,” Ensiklopedia of Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 125–129, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Yadispama Maiga, W., Wagino, Fernandez, D., Nanda, I., & Mahardika, T. (2026). Peningkatan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Dasar-Dasar Otomotif melalui Case Based Learning di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan . JTPVI: Jurnal Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Vokasi Indonesia, 4(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.24036/jtpvi.v4i1.394

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.